Subject	agree 100%
Posted by	Madhatter10-6 on July 25, 2006 at 12:20 PM
	This message has been viewed 27 times.
In Reply To	That's an oversimplification. posted by Kenny on July 25, 2006 at 12:18 PM
Message	you can have a high HP Z that is still very realible as long as everything is properly accounted for. Madhatter10-6: 1991 Twin Turbo Stage: Not Operational
Follow Ups	What would be a safe hp # on stock motor? - jakescakes 11:59:26 07/25/06 Safe? - Kenny 12:10:42 07/25/06 Overboosting the car is the real danger. (n/m) - BrianTT(TPA,FL) 12:14:01 07/25/06 That's an oversimplification. - Kenny 12:18:43 07/25/06 agree 100% - Madhatter10-6 12:20:41 07/25/06 "Reliable "..sorry ;) (n/m) - Madhatter10-6 12:21:31 07/25/06 Very true and well put! (n/m) - BrianTT(TPA,FL) 12:29:52 07/25/06 I think what he means is - zxtuner161 14:09:44 07/25/06 He can meet his stated goal on a stock bottom end... - Kenny 14:22:36 07/25/06 well i think what he means is - zxtuner161 14:27:35 07/25/06 It's never a bad idea at any stage to upgrade internals. - Kenny 14:33:50 07/25/06 It is a sliding scale. The more power you make, the higher - Ash's Z 14:15:21 07/25/06 well said ... as was Kenny's reply (n/m) - Guapo 14:22:51 07/25/06 "replies" - he is up to 4 now (n/m) - dpjax 16:10:49 07/25/06 no, just the one (n/m) - Guapo 16:21:24 07/25/06 I've = I have, IV = Intravenous (n/m) - BigTDogg (MA) 14:35:04 07/25/06 or four (n/m) - zgene4 17:33:43 07/25/06 Well thank you all for your replies - jakescakes 17:56:36 07/25/06
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.